ACP issues guideline on glucose management for hospitalized patients
By Stacey Butterfield
It's been almost a whole decade now that blood glucose management has been a cause of turmoil and debate in hospital medicine. In November 2001, Van den Berghe and colleagues published a study in the New England Journal of Medicine finding that intensive insulin therapy with glucose targets of 80 to 100 mg/dL reduced morbidity and mortality in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Many hospitals and hospitalists changed their management practices accordingly.
Then, in the late 2000s, other studies, including the NICE-SUGAR trial, began to provide evidence that intensive insulin with a normoglycemic target harmed patients. Physicians, hospitals and guidelines began shifting away from intensive control in light of the emerging evidence against it, but questions and uncertainties remained.
In an effort to answer some of those questions, ACP experts recently gathered the available evidence and developed a guideline regarding intensive insulin therapy for general and ICU inpatients, published in the Feb. 15 Annals of Internal Medicine. Lead author Amir Qaseem, PhD, FACP, director of clinical policy for the College, recently spoke to ACP Hospitalist about the guideline.
Q: Why were these guidelines needed?
A: Hyperglycemia is a very common finding among medical and surgical patients with or without diabetes. It's associated with increased morbidity, mortality and cost, and also poor immune response, increased cardiovascular events, thrombosis, etc. Most clinicians make an effort to prevent and control this hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting.
But what is the optimal target for the hospitalized patient in terms of glycemic control? We wanted to address this issue. We address the management of hyperglycemia and evaluate the benefits and harms associated with the use of intensive insulin therapy to achieve tight glycemic control in hospitalized patients with or without diabetes.
Q: What are you seeing in current practice regarding inpatient glucose management?
A: The earlier trials that came out and strongly suggested that intensive insulin therapy leads to better outcomes—it's something that has been widely adopted in hospitals and in the ICU. But now there has been new evidence suggesting otherwise. This has caused some confusion on what are the optimal targets. Is targeting normal glycemia a good strategy or not a good strategy? Does it lead to better outcomes in patients or not? In this paper, we define intensive insulin therapy as blood glucose between 80 and 110 mg/dL (4.4-6.1 mmol/L).
Q: Two of the new guideline's three recommendations tell physicians what not to do, rather than specifying what glycemic levels they should target. Why is this?
A: You're right, some of the places we are saying what not to do because that's also important. You can end up harming patients in doing certain things.
In the first recommendation, ACP recommends not using intensive insulin therapy to strictly control blood glucose in non-surgical ICU/medical ICU [SICU/MICU] patients with or without diabetes, which is a strong recommendation based on moderate-quality evidence. What we found is that there is no reduction in mortality with the target blood glucose levels between 80 and 180 mg/dL (4.4-10 mmol/L) compared to higher levels. The [lower targets] did not have any impact in patients who had myocardial infarction, stroke, brain injury or folks who are under perioperative care.
On the other hand, harms are likely to increase when target blood sugar levels are too low. The reason we did not specify the target level is because in all these trials, the range varied. However, we found that avoiding targets less than 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) definitely should be a priority, because that was leading to more harm. It leads to hypoglycemia and increased length of stay and even increased mortality, although the consequences of increased hypoglycemia were not really clear. Again, it goes back to the [evidence being] so unclear. For non-SICU/MICU patients, we do not really specify a target.
Q: How about the second and third recommendations?
A: For patients who are in the SICU and MICU, we recommend not using intensive insulin therapy to normalize blood glucose in patients with or without diabetes. This is a strong recommendation, based on high-quality evidence, because what we found is having targets between 80 and 110 mg/dL (4.4-6.1 mmol/L), you're doing more damage than good. It's associated with increase in mortality.
But what target level do you use in these patients? We recommend that between 140 and 200 mg/dL (7.8-10 mmol/L) is a reasonable target. That's a weak recommendation, based on moderate-quality evidence. This is based on the levels utilized in the trials, so that's all we can base our recommendation on. We do not have a precise and narrow range for blood glucose level. What we found from the trials is if you keep the blood glucose levels between 140 and 200 mg/dL (7.8-10 mmol/L), it's associated with similar mortality outcomes as if you had it between 80 and 110 mg/dL (4.4-6.1 mmol/L).
Q: Is additional research needed to come to more definitive conclusions?
A: Yes, there's always more research that can be done. We probably can have more trials on these insulin protocols in non-ICU settings. It's still not really clear what is the impact of hypoglycemia or what specific target levels can be used in ICU settings and non-ICU settings. More of these studies that can narrow down the range of the target blood glucose level will always be helpful.
Q: The evidence and guidance on inpatient glucose management have varied widely in recent years. Has the pendulum on this issue returned to a middle point where it's likely to remain for some time?
A: This is all dependent on the evidence. In the past, the evidence showed that tight glycemic control leads to better outcomes. But now we have enough evidence that shows that tight glycemic control is actually doing more harm than benefit.
I always say our guidelines are based on current evidence. If some other high quality trials came out that show something completely different, that may change something. But I do think that tight glycemic control is definitely harmful. There is high quality evidence that goes in that direction. But for now, this guideline is based on best available current evidence.
Q: Any other advice you would offer hospitalists on this subject?
A: Intensive insulin therapy is associated with a high risk for severe hypoglycemia, especially when the blood glucose level target is less than 6.7 mmol/L (120 mg/dL). Given that the harms outweigh the benefits, we should not routinely implement strict targets for blood glucose control in hospitalized patients.
A clinical practice guideline on use of intensive insulin therapy for the management of glycemic control in hospitalized patients
Recommendation 1: ACP recommends not using intensive insulin therapy to strictly control blood glucose in non-surgical intensive care unit (SICU)/medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients with or without diabetes mellitus (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 2: ACP recommends not using intensive insulin therapy to normalize blood glucose in SICU/MICU patients with or without diabetes mellitus (Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence). Recommendation 3: ACP recommends a target blood glucose level of 7.8 to 11.1 mmol/L (140 to 200 mg/dL) if insulin therapy is used in SICU/MICU patients (Grade: weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
Are you involved in hospital medicine? Then you should be getting ACP Hospitalist and ACP HospitalistWeekly. Subscribe now.
ACP Hospitalist Weekly
From the January 11, 2017 edition
- New pathway may rule out more patients, miss fewer MIs than guideline-approved pathway
- Concomitant vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam associated with increased incidence of AKI in systematic review
ACP Career Connection
Looking for a new hospitalist position?
ACP Career Connection can help you find your next job in hospital medicine. Search hospitalist positions nationwide that suit your criteria and preferences. Jobs are posted about two weeks before print publication of Annals of Internal Medicine, ACP Internist, and ACP Hospitalist. Exclusive “Online Direct” opportunities are updated weekly. Check us out online.
ABIM Maintenance of Certification for Hospitalists
Hospital-based internists have the option of maintaining their certification in either Internal Medicine or Internal Medicine with a Focused Practice in Hospital Medicine. Learn more about resources from ACP to complete both MOC programs.
- ACP MOC Resources - ACP offers a variety of recertification resources to help you earn both MOC points and CME credits through the same educational program.
Not an ACP Member?
Join today and discover the benefits waiting for you.
ACP offers different categories of membership depending on your career stage and professional status. View options, pricing and benefits.
A New Way to Ace the Boards!
Ensure you're board-exam ready with ACP's Board Prep Ace - a multifaceted, self-study program that prepares you to pass the ABIM Certification Exam in internal medicine. Learn more.